Analyse Trading
Available on Google Play
Install

Win rate and expectancy: does your strategy really make money?

6 min readFreeAnalyse-Trading team
Key takeaways
  • Win rate alone tells you nothing: you have to combine it with the average size of wins and losses.
  • Expectancy = (win rate × average win) − (loss rate × average loss): it must be positive after costs.
  • Expectancy is measured over dozens of trades at the very least, never over a handful.
Contents
  1. Win rate and its limits
  2. The expectancy formula
  3. Two worked examples
  4. Thinking in R
  5. Pitfalls to avoid

“I win seven trades out of ten.” It is the line you hear most often from traders who want to impress. It proves nothing. A trader who wins 70% of the time can easily lose money, and another who wins only 35% of the time can be comfortably profitable. To know which one has a strategy that holds up, you need a single number: expectancy.

Win rate and its limits

Your win rate is the share of your trades that close in profit. Out of 50 trades with 20 winners, it is 40%. The loss rate is its complement: 60% here. It is easy to calculate and nice to look at when it is high, but it completely ignores the size of your wins and losses.

A strategy that banks lots of small wins and a few very large losses can show a beautiful win rate while draining the account. That is typically what happens to traders who close their winners quickly and let their losers run, hoping they will come back.

The expectancy formula

Expectancy = (Win rate × Average win) − (Loss rate × Average loss)

Expectancy tells you what your strategy makes or costs on average per trade. If it is positive, each new trade adds money to your account on average over the long run. If it is negative, the more you trade, the more you lose, however good your best days are.

1:11:21:31:420 %40 %60 %ProfitableLosingR:R ratio → · win rate ↑
Two strategies compared: the one that wins less often but with bigger wins has a positive expectancy, the other loses despite its high win rate.

Two worked examples

Strategy A: few winners, big wins
Win rate
40%
Average win
$200
Loss rate
60%
Average loss
$100
Calculation
(0.40 × 200) − (0.60 × 100) = 80 − 60
Expectancy per trade
+$20

Over 100 trades, that is +$2,000 on average.

Strategy B: many winners, big losses
Win rate
70%
Average win
$50
Loss rate
30%
Average loss
$150
Calculation
(0.70 × 50) − (0.30 × 150) = 35 − 45
Expectancy per trade
−$10

Over 100 trades, that is −$1,000 on average, despite seven winning trades out of ten.

Strategy B is the one that feels best day to day: you win almost every day. Yet it is the one that destroys the account. Strategy A is more uncomfortable, with long losing streaks, but it is the one that produces a positive result.

Thinking in R

To compare strategies regardless of account size, expectancy is often expressed in R, meaning multiples of the risk taken per trade. If you always risk 1R and your winners make 2R on average, a strategy with a 40% win rate gives 0.40 × 2 − 0.60 × 1 = 0.2R per trade.

Win rateAverage winExpectancy per trade
30%2R−0.1R
40%1.5R0.0R
40%2R+0.2R
50%1R0.0R
55%1.2R+0.21R
60%0.5R−0.1R

With 1% risk per trade, an expectancy of +0.2R means about +0.2% of capital per trade on average. That sounds small. Over 200 trades in a year, though, it is a solid result, provided the measured expectancy is real and holds up over time.

You can also turn the formula around to set yourself targets. If your measured win rate is 45%, what average win do you need to break even? You need 0.45 × average win to equal 0.55 × 1R, so an average win of about 1.22R. Below that you lose; above it you win. This tells you whether the way you manage your exits fits how often you are right.

Calculating expectancy from your journal
Trades logged
60
Winners
27 trades, +$4,860 in total
Losers
33 trades, −$3,300 in total
Win rate / average win
45% / $180
Loss rate / average loss
55% / $100
Calculation
(0.45 × 180) − (0.55 × 100) = 81 − 55
Expectancy per trade
+$26

Check: (4,860 − 3,300) ÷ 60 = $26. Expectancy is simply the net result divided by the number of trades.

Pitfalls to avoid

  • Sample too small: over 10 trades, chance dominates. You need dozens of trades, ideally more than a hundred, before drawing a conclusion.
  • Forgotten costs: calculate your average win and average loss after spread, commission and swap. An expectancy of +$3 before costs can turn negative after them.
  • Market conditions: an expectancy measured in a trend can vanish in a directionless market. Note the context of every trade.
  • Changing your method: if you change your rules along the way, you are no longer measuring the same strategy.

Be wary of results posted by other traders, too. A high win rate shown without the average loss, or a total profit shown without the number of trades, does not let you calculate expectancy. Always ask for both halves of the formula: how many trades win, and how much the winners and the losers make or cost on average.

Check your understanding

0 / 3
1. Win rate 50%, average win $150, average loss $100. What is the expectancy per trade?
2. A strategy wins 80% of the time. What can you conclude?
3. 40% win rate, winners at 2R on average, losers at 1R. What is the expectancy?

Educational content, not investment advice. Leveraged trading carries a high risk of losing money rapidly: most retail investor accounts lose money on these products.